Home » Authors, Christian Right Watch, Climate Change, Donald A. Collins, Editor's Choice, Highlights, Meaning of the 21st Century, Most popular, Opinion, Population Stress, Straight talk, The Cross of Papal Infallibility, Top Stories » Finally the correct words to articulate our fatal population growth dilemma

Finally the correct words to articulate our fatal population growth dilemma

Describing mankind as a "plague on the Earth", veteran nature broadcaster Sir David Attenborough says we need to limit population growth or the natural world will do it for us

FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditPrintFriendly

By Donald A. Collins | 25 January 2013
Church and State

Not that this individual is the first to spell out the major culprit of our increasing planetary woes. Certainly Paul Ehrlich’s prognostications and those of many others come to mind.

But here is the right LANGUAGE which should send shivers down the spines of all of us, not just the enlightened cognoscenti who have so ably put forth the facts on global warming, environmental degradation and the likely collapse of civil society.

Who is this savant? Wikipedia tells us

“Sir David Frederick Attenborough, OM, CH, CVO, CBE, FRS, FZS, FSA (born 8 May 1926) is a British broadcaster and naturalist.

His career as the face and voice of natural history programmes has endured for 60 years. He is best known for writing and presenting the nine Life series, in conjunction with the BBC Natural History Unit, which collectively form a comprehensive by survey of all life on the planet. He is also a former senior manager at the BBC, having served as controller of BBC Two and director of programming for BBC Television in the 1960s and 1970s. He is the only person to have won a BAFTA in black and white, colour, HD and 3D.

Attenborough is widely considered a national treasure in Britain, although he himself does not like the term. In 2002 he was named among the 100 Greatest Britons following a UK-wide vote. He is a younger brother of director, producer and actor Richard Attenborough.”

Again, our colleague, Joe Bish, of Population Media has highlighted this signal announcement with these words and with these attached reference materials which we suggest you read and watch in full.

You may have seen headlines in the past few days relating to Sir David Attenborough’s recent remarks, which reportedly went something like:

“We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now.”

Coverage has been robust!

Two items below relate to this story. First is a link — or click on the photo — to an article where you can hear a 5-minute MP3 audio report, in which Population Matters Chief Executive, Simon Ross, gives commentary on the Attenborough story.

Also providing commentary on the audio is Rob Bailey, a senior energy, environment and resources research fellow at the Chatham House think tank. Mr. Baily’s concludes that: “We are now in a period where the earth’s environment, climate, biodiversity and water resources are changing with unprecedented rapidity…. That is all the result of man’s activities on the planet and it’s going to have profound implications for us. So I think there’s a lot of truth in that statement, unfortunately.”

Sir David Attenborough recommends population control to avoid “plague on the Earth”
See: http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_01_23/Sir-David-Attenborough-recommends-population-control/

Secondly is a story published at Live Science.

Filmmaker Sir David Attenborough Calls Humans a Plague
22 January 2013

Sir David Attenborough, the famed British naturalist and television presenter, has some harsh words for humanity.

“We are a plague on the Earth,” Attenborough told the Radio Times, as reported by the Telegraph. “It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so.”

Attenborough went on to say that both climate change and “sheer space” were looming problems for humanity.

“Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now,” he said.

Sir David is not the only naturalist who has warned of population growth outstripping resources. Paul Ehrlich, the president of the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford University and author of “The Population Bomb” (Sierra Club-Ballantine, 1968) has long used language similar to Attenborough’s. And in 2011, an analysis of species loss suggested that humans are beginning to cause a mass extinction on the order of the one that killed the dinosaurs.

When asked about Attenborough’s comments on humanity as its own scourge, Ehrlich told LiveScience he “completely agree[d], as does every other scientist who understands the situation.”

Even so, that doesn’t mean forceful measures must be taken. “Government propaganda, taxes, giving every sexually active human being access to modern contraception and backup abortion, and, especially, giving women absolutely equal rights and opportunities with men might very well get the global population shrinkage required if a collapse is to be avoided,” Ehrlich said.

In fact, providing free, reliable birth control to women could prevent between 41 percent and 71 percent of abortions in the United States, according to a study detailed in the Oct. 4, 2012, issue of the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Other scientists also agreed to some extent with the heart of Attenborough’s message.

“It’s clear that increasing population growth makes some of our biggest environmental challenges harder to solve, not easier,” said from Jerry Karnas, population campaign director for the Center for Biological Diversity in Tucson, Ariz.

Karnas added, however, “What’s needed is not population control but a real emphasis on reproductive rights, women’s empowerment, universal access to birth control and education, so more freedom for folks to make better, more informed family planning choices.”

And population numbers would matter less for the planet’s health if clean renewable energy were widely adopted as well as planning laws, he told LiveScience during an interview.

Attenborough is famous for his “Life on Earth” series of wildlife documentaries, among other nature programming. In 2009, he became a patron of the Population Matters, a group that advocates voluntary population limitation. At the time, he released a statement saying, “I’ve seen wildlife under mounting human pressure all over the world and it’s not just from human economy or technology — behind every threat is the frightening explosion in human numbers.”

Earth’s population reached 7 billion people on or around Oct. 31, 2011, according to United Nations estimates.

In trying to determine routes to survival, one could readily say as a recent TED speaker Alexandra Paul did that the planet could not survive with more than 2 billion humans. She suggested everyone think about a one child family. This of course will not happen, but even 2 billion will not be sustainable should people around the world try and possibly attain the living standards developed countries have enjoyed for decades.

The Plague is upon us. The prospect raised by credible experts about world population reaching 10 billion or more suggests that the gentler routes to a population stabilization or reduction will not be forthcoming. Yes, full contraceptive access could be a major help, but its fulfillment on a timely basis is unlikely.

Life as I have enjoyed it will not be the lot of my children or theirs and I deeply regret this fact. However, Sir David has at least articulated the unspeakable truth — or as Walt Kelly’s cartoon possum so beautifully put it at a time years ago when the gentler solutions were possible, “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

Former US Navy officer, banker and venture capitalist, Donald A. Collins, a free lance writer living in Washington, DC., has spent over 40 years working for women’s reproductive health as a board member and/or officer of numerous family planning organizations including Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Guttmacher Institute, Family Health International and Ipas. Yale under graduate, NYU MBA. He is the author of From the Dissident Left: A Collection of Essays 2004-2013.

Heading for a World Apocalypse?
By Donald A. Collins
Published in The Social Contract
Volume 20, Number 4 (Summer 2010)
Issue theme: “Remembering Terry Anderson”
http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc_20_4/tsc_20_4_collins.shtml



Talking About What We Don’t Want to Talk About: Alexandra Paul at TEDxTalks

Alexandra Paul gave the following presentation on the population issue at TEDx Topanga in early November. Paul has long been upset that out of the thousands of TED Talks to date, nary a one deals directly with human population.

During her activist career, Paul has written and produced JAMPACKED, an educational film broadcast on PBS about the human overpopulation crisis, which has won several environmental awards. She has also personally spoken, classroom-by-classroom, to over six thousand Los Angeles teenagers on the issue of human overpopulation. She has been honored by the United Nations for work on human overpopulation; been awarded the Green Cross Award by Mikael Gorbachev’s Global Green for Leadership on the Environment; and was named Activist of the Year in 2005 from the ACLU of Southern California.

Be sure to ‘like’ us on Facebook

Related posts:

FREE BOOK: The Pope and the New Apocalypse: The Holy War Aga...
Vatican Rejection of Freedom of the Press
America’s population predicament: exceeding carrying capacit...
The Power and the Glory: Inside the Dark Heart of John Paul ...
Pontificating The Same Hard Line With Humility and Sly Softn...

10 Responses to Finally the correct words to articulate our fatal population growth dilemma

  1. myth buster Reply

    March 3, 2013 at 12:02 am

    If that be the case, so be it. I notice the people who pitch forcibly aborting or sterilizing others never commit suicide. So if you say, "Let's cap the population at 7 billion," I say, "May the population double, and may every one of the eugenicists be scorned and derided at every turn!" You people are monsters, and I don't use that term lightly. Even Rev. Malthus would condemn everything you say. He preached self-control and continence as a means for controlling population growth. And if having 14 billion people will inevitably result in war, famine and plague, then God's will be done; I have no right to criticize Him.

    The Lord giveth, the Lord taketh away, blessed be the Lord! Far better for ten billion people to die in a plague than to submit ourselves to those who would dictate who lives and who dies, who reproduces and who doesn't. As it is, I believe anyone who believes in population control should be banned from working for the government.

    • Ian on the Hill Reply

      October 26, 2013 at 11:25 am

      Wonderful – you've evoked sadness, anger, hilarity and scorn in a single post.

    • Anonymous Reply

      October 27, 2013 at 12:20 pm

      MORON.

    • Dr Monika Fisher Reply

      December 23, 2014 at 11:58 pm

      So, you're obviously not a naturalist, and you obviously prefer semitic DRIVEL (bible, et ketera) to a scientific approach. What is WRONG with PC & E (Population Control & Eugeniks) ?? Personally, I'd prefer QUALITY over sheer QUANTITY every time – but mediocre minds, who are unfortunately in the majority, LOVE imperfection and mediocrity. I'VE lived for 73 years, have an IQ of 155, which I understand is five points below that estimated for Albert Einstein – and have ZERO little retards. The last two points are connected !! Worldwide numbers of we arrogant, aberrant chimpanzee vermin should be no more than about 500,000 – SOME folks say ZERO, we're Nature's Big Mistake. As I'm always saying, if my job were rubber-stamping applications to breed, I wouldn't expect my inkpad to run dry anytime soon, if I were you !!
      Obviously, only a madman would be complacent about a 180# primate numbering 7,000,200,000 on a planet of Earth's size, and given that drastic reduction is desperately needed, we should take the opportunity to raise quality at the same time by sterilizing all who wore spectacles as a child, or a deaf-aid, all who have genetic flaws or diseases, have a familial tendency to be obese, are under 5'7", albIno or ugly. "Ugly" tends to be antisocial, since they are denied many things accessible to more attractive people, in the way of jobs, life opportunities and choice of partners. AND feeling attraction to beautiful people is Nature's way of ensuring any offspring are more likely to be healthy and genetically A1, since external beauty bespeaks inner health.
      Over 70 years ago, the leading lights of society were all in favor of PC & E, from the aristocracy to Hardy, TE Lawrence (of Arabia) and Henry Williamson, and the concept has far earlier notables who recommended it – no less a personage than that great intellectual, Plato himself….:D

  2. realistic being Reply

    October 26, 2013 at 11:58 am

    Thats it myth lets all pray for more children to starve because it the lords will.

  3. Alejandro Solà Reply

    October 26, 2013 at 1:24 pm

    "Myth buster", how about busting myths as retarded as your religion?

  4. JOhn Reply

    November 10, 2013 at 3:04 pm

    So true. But maybe we can help reduce certain segments of the population by infiltrating GOP Facebook pages and posting propaganda that Americas guns will in fact be confiscated very soon in days if not hours. This should not only increase gun sales to GOP households but also encourage GOP members to keep loaded guns laying around all over their homes for all their young children to play with. Thus we can think to ourselves child gun accident are just like Global warming and DO NOT EXIST. Well in the mind of a GOP member any way. If we concentrate in Texas we maybe able to turn the state Blue even sooner. Lets face it GOP gun suicide is a GREAT way to make room for more liberal voting Latinos.

  5. Steven Earl Salmony Reply

    January 20, 2014 at 2:52 pm

    We appear to live in a time in which humankind’s perception has fractured schizophrenogenically and clarity of vision has been lost; when incoherent minds determine what was real; a period of abject intellectual dishonesty and the absence of moral courage. Political convenience, economic expediency, specious demographics, ideological idiocy, social status quo, religious dogma, cultural prescription and incomprehensible greed rule the world, reign supreme, darken the surface of Earth and threaten future human well being and environmental health.

  6. Rosemary Lowe Reply

    October 5, 2014 at 11:21 pm

    The Dark Ages, when religion ruled the Earth–and apparently still in some distorted minds.

  7. Dale R. Carselli Reply

    February 1, 2015 at 8:38 pm

    As long as greed and power trump everything else nothing will change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

FAIR USE NOTICE
This is a not-for-profit site. It contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for educational purposes as part of our efforts to advance understanding of human rights issues and other matters of political, cultural and humanitarian significance in a global perspective. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.