Catholic Church Thinks It Shouldn’t Have To Pay Fines For Abuse Because Of Religious Freedom

By Wendy Gittleson | 11 March 2015
Addicting Info

Cardinal Timothy Dolan allegedly transferred church funds into a separate trust in order to protect them from clergy abuse lawsuits. (Image: AP Photo / Seth Wenig)

For everyone who warned that the Hobby Lobby case, in which the Supreme Court ruled that a retail store can have a religious exemption when it comes to covering birth control, would become a slippery slope – we’re sliding right to the bottom.

The Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee is claiming a similar defense in its sex abuse cases, but only after they tried hiding the money from their victims first.

The accusations against the Milwaukee Archdiocese are particularly horrific. They involve 45 priests who are accused of molesting almost 200 deaf boys.

According to Think Progress, they first sealed the $55 million in funds from bankruptcy by putting it in a trust for cemeteries and mausoleums. They then tried the religious freedom defense. That worked at first, when a court ruled in 2013 that their religious freedom did shield them from paying victims.

On Monday, though, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals overruled the first court. That doesn’t necessarily mean that the victims will see the money, though. It will likely be appealed again.

The church is claiming that because the money is in a fund for cemeteries and mausoleums, they won’t be able to fulfill their obligation of servicing dead people if they are forced to pay for the people whose lives they’ve ruined.

Religious freedom became an issue after the archdiocese claimed that it had a Canonical obligation to “properly maintain in perpetuity” the cemeteries and mausoleums funded through the trust. If victims of sex abuse or other creditors are compensated out of these funds, the archdiocese says, “there will be no funds or, at best, insufficient funds, for the perpetual care of the Milwaukee Catholic Cemeteries,” and thus the archdiocese claims that it will be unable to fulfill a religious obligation.

In rejecting this claim that the archdiocese has a religious right to spend the trust’s funds on burial places and only on burial places, the Seventh Circuit offers several reasons why religious freedom cannot trump the rights of the archdiocese’s creditors and those of its clergy’s victims. Perhaps most significantly, the court holds that the archdiocese’s religious liberty claim would fail even under the strictest level of constitutional scrutiny.

Source: Think Progress

The court ruled in a way I think the Supreme Court should have ruled in the Hobby Lobby case. They ruled that churches don’t get to opt out of paying Social Security taxes – that the public’s interest can supersede religious freedom:

Drawing a comparison to a Supreme Court decision holding that religious objectors may not opt out of Social Security taxes, the court notes that federal bankruptcy law, like Social Security, “’serves the public interest by providing a comprehensive … system with a variety of benefits available to all participants’ nationwide.” Just as Social Security “aids those who have reached a certain age or are disabled, the Code aids those who have reached a certain financial condition and who need assistance repaying or recovering a debt.”

The court warns that if this becomes precedent that there’s no telling where it will end. Anyone at anytime can join or create a cult just to “gain economic advantage.” I would argue that the Hobby Lobby ruling could do something very similar. Businesses can use their own religious beliefs, no matter how bizarre, to discriminate or to violate laws.

Mea Maxima Culpa, Trailer

Archbishop Carlson on criminal child sexual abuse

Be sure to ‘like’ us on Facebook

28 COMMENTS

  1. Children should be compensated for the suffering they had to bare … If there is no money for monosolium and creamation for us aging populationI still think the Children should be compensated first for the life of hell they had to bare …

  2. IF the "journalist" who wrote this article actually understood the difference between catholicism verses Christianity, you would have never compared Hobby Lobby to the catholic church. I look forward to the day when such journalists are as open-minded as they make themselves out to be to the truth.

  3. It's not unreasonable to expect to find, in any large organization, some Bad Actors- Bad Apples- who cause great harm. Those are bad but not unexpected. What the Roman Catholic Church is willfully ignorant of, is just how EVIL their responses were: rather than removing credibly accused priests from contact with children and referring them to secular law enforcement, and automatically defrocking them upon conviction (what nearly ALL the laity thinks should happen), the hierarchy moves these priests around, crossing national borders if need be, and actively facilitates their preying on new, unsuspecting children.
    The enabling of the child rape is what SHOULD outrage anyone who even sort of cares about children; THAT'S what makes the RCC look so evil.

  4. It's not unreasonable to expect to find, in any large organization, some Bad Actors- Bad Apples- who cause great harm. Those are bad but not unexpected. What the Roman Catholic Church is willfully ignorant of, is just how EVIL their responses were: rather than removing credibly accused priests from contact with children and referring them to secular law enforcement, and automatically defrocking them upon conviction (what nearly ALL the laity thinks should happen), the hierarchy moves these priests around, crossing national borders if need be, and actively facilitates their preying on new, unsuspecting children.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here