10 Reasons Christianity Makes No Sense

By Godless Mama | 28 December 2015
Secular Press

When I discovered the online atheist community a few years ago, one of the things that astounded and humbled me the most was the scholarliness of so many activist atheists. I had never before been in the company of so many people so versed in scripture, so skilled in the arts of rhetoric and argumentation, so keen to identifying and deconstructing logical fallacies. I’m not going to lie: It’s often been intimidating to be surrounded by people whose expertise in such things is so far beyond my own, comparatively unsophisticated approach. But as time passes and I learn more and more about these subjects, I find that my basic issues with religion in general, and Christianity in particular, have not evolved to more abstract ontological questions, but have rather crystallized my inability to reconcile even the most basic and fundamental principles of Christian faith.

1. Jesus didn’t die. Christians are always going on about how Jesus died for our sins, but if he came back 3 days later then he didn’t die at all; more like being in a brief coma, which is a drag, but not exactly the ultimate sacrifice that the crucifixion is cracked up to be. And it wasn’t just his spirit that departed to heaven, but his actual physical being. If you go dig up a 3-day old grave, regardless of what you think may have happened to that person’s immortal soul, there’s still going to be a body in it. Jesus’ tomb, on the other hand, was empty, meaning that following his resurrection he was either a zombie or he was fully alive, neither of which is dead. Even more relevant is that when he was hanging there on the cross, Jesus knew that he was going to come back. He didn’t have to endure the fear of death that any other human being would have had to face or the uncertainty that presumably afflicts all but the most devout at the moment of death about whether there really was going to be an afterlife, or if this was lights out for good. Yes, he probably suffered physically, but he knew that death would be no more than a long nap and then he’d be up and at ‘em again. In short, he didn’t die.

2. Jesus didn’t have faith. Jesus was always rolling his eyes and scolding his disciples for not having enough faith. There are many verses to be found in the New Testament in which Jesus says some variation of, “Don’t trust your senses, don’t look for evidence, just accept it because I said so.” But if Jesus was the son of god, then faith wasn’t something he needed – he knew god and heaven were real because that’s where he came from, no faith required. How fair is it to command the rest of the world to believe something on faith alone, threatening eternal punishment to any who don’t believe it, when you yourself have no faith and all the evidence?

3. Jesus didn’t take away my sins. Or did he? I am no logician, but if Jesus died to take away the sins of humanity, then doesn’t that mean that once he was crucified there was no longer any such thing as sin? If his “death” was the absolution of the human race, which we are told it was, why do I still have to do what the bible says, or go to church, or even believe? Aren’t I already saved by his “sacrifice?” And if I am not, and there are still rules to follow and sins that could keep me out of heaven, then what exactly was the point?

4. Jesus wasn’t a very nice guy. American Christians talk a lot about so-called family values, but that concept doesn’t have much, if any, basis in the actual story of Christ. Jesus demanded that his disciples abandon their families and save all of their devotion for him and him alone – a rather narcissistic and not particularly family-centric expectation. Aside from seeming to be in direct contradiction to the commandment about honoring thy mother and father, abandoning spouses and children, while not against any commandments, still seems like a douchey thing to do, even 2,000 years ago.

5. Jesus’ dad was really not a nice guy. We all know that the bible is full of rape, murder, genocide, slavery, and every manner of atrocity – and not in a, “This is what our enemies do so don’t be like them” way, but in a “As long as you are one of mine, have at it” way. Then Jesus showed up and said, more or less, that the old laws still applied, and he wasn’t about to change them. Yes, he was willing to call out hypocrisy, and he did seem to care somewhat about social justice – at least with regard to poverty and leprosy – but otherwise he was still the enforcer of some rather distasteful rules. And don’t even get me started on Jesus being his own father – a concept that, in addition to making no sense, makes Jesus himself the very same god of the Old Testament that Christians like to dismiss as no longer relevant (except when it comes to hating gays).

6. Prayer is contradictory. We are told that god has a plan for everything, but then we are told to pray – for our loved ones to get better when they fall ill, for safety in the storm, for the home team to win the big game. Does that mean god will change his plan if you pray hard enough, or the right way, or get enough other people to pray for the same thing? At the very least this seems to suggest he doesn’t really have much of a plan if he’s willing to modify it based on popular opinion or for those who ingratiate themselves to him, not to mention that it’s a rather arbitrary, if not capricious, approach to human suffering. Further, people often say they pray for things like inner peace, strength, understanding, the solution to personal problems, etc. I don’t pray, but I do a lot of introspection in search of those same things, and then I do either what my conscience tells me is right or what my objectivity tells me has the best chance for the desired outcome. I suspect that people who pray end up doing more or less the same thing but attributing their conclusion to an outside agency. If that is the case, how can they explain that atheists (or members of other religions) can get to the same place with no (or a different) agent? And how strange is it, anyway, to carve out your conscience, that innermost part of yourself, the very core of what makes you you, and say it isn’t you?

7. The bible doesn’t set the moral bar very high. Let’s face it: Don’t rape people, don’t own people, don’t hate people, and don’t hurt children are kind of no-brainers when it comes to morality. Our friend Jesus and his old man not only failed to make these things clear, but in many instances they encouraged, condoned, or commanded them. Sure, Jesus said a few things about loving your neighbor and being kind to strangers, but he also said that not believing in him was the worst offense a person could commit and that anyone who didn’t believe would burn in Hell for all eternity. And seriously, the Ten Commandments as a basis for all morality? Checking out your neighbor’s wife is worse than raping his daughter? Taking the lord’s name in vain is worse than owning slaves? Nice priorities. Add to this the fact that god himself does not follow his own rules, to which Christians respond that mere mortals cannot understand or judge the morality of god. But if the bible defines morality, and god has a different set of rules for himself than for humans, and we are not allowed to know or understand his rules except that we are expected to do as he says but not as he does, then how exactly does that provide any kind of moral baseline whatsoever?

8. Christian love is not very loving. We hear a lot about Jesus’ love and god’s love, and how god so loved the world that he gave his only son, yada yada yada. We already covered the part about him not really giving up his son, and enough has been said by people smarter than I am about the questionable necessity of having a baby, leaving him be for 30 years, torturing him to death, and then bringing him back to life a few days later as a way of forgiving humanity instead of – oh, I don’t know, just saying “I forgive you.” We covered too that this supposed forgiveness isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on if I’m still considered a sinner and an apostate and bound for hell for not believing. But if we set that part of the contradiction aside, how loosely are we defining love if we are applying it to the bible? “I love you so much that I will torture and murder my own son as a symbol of something I could just give you without the bloodbath. I love you so much that I will reward you with an eternity in heaven, but you have to suffer and die in this world first. Salvation is yours, so long as you swear your devotion to me and only me. And believe what I say even if it sounds like nonsense because I told you to. And admit that deep down you are a rotten piece of garbage who doesn’t really deserve my love. And if you don’t do all of these things you will burn in a lake of fire for all eternity. But seriously, I love you.”

9. Terrible things happen to good people. A quarter of a million people died in the tsunami of 2006. Twenty first graders and six adults were slaughtered at Sandy Hook. People die of starvation, are killed by war and disease, are raped or beaten by people who have power over them, and suffer in countless other ways. If there is an omniscient, omnipotent god who is also loving, as Christians would have us believe, why do these things happen? Why do children suffer and die? Why are there droughts and floods and famines and pestilences and earthquakes and wars? Why couldn’t god just make people nice? Why create natural disasters? Why didn’t he set forth better, clearer rules to eliminate ambiguity about how we are supposed to treat each other? God either intervenes or he doesn’t; god is either omnipotent or he isn’t. If he does and he is, then suffering exists because god intends for it to be that way. If he doesn’t and he isn’t, then he isn’t in control of anything, including the minutiae of how we live our daily lives. How is either a god worth worshipping?

10. It’s all just way too convenient. Got what you prayed for? He answered your prayers. Praise Jesus! Didn’t get it? He has another plan. Praise Jesus! Don’t have the answers? You’re not meant to. Praise Jesus! Figured out the answer? He chose you. Praise Jesus! Sad about the deaths of your loved ones? They’re in a better place. Praise Jesus! Sad about how much your life sucks? You’ll be happy once you’re dead. Praise Jesus! Honestly, when the answer to every question is exactly the thing that makes you feel best / most comforted / least in need of using your own intellect, should that not send up a huge red flag that maybe you’re not being completely objective?

These are not overtly intellectual, clever, or even particularly insightful observations, nor am I the first person to make them. But as someone who has lived an entire life without religion, the exercises of engaging apologists, philosophizing, or running ontological obstacle courses seem – perhaps naively, but seem nonetheless – to be almost beside the point when the most basic premises of religious belief are so deeply flawed. These irreconcilable contradictions explain a lot about why religious indoctrination is necessary at a very young age, and sadly, they explain a lot about why the world is in the sorry state it is: Because they make people adept at rationalizing the irrational, believing the unlikely, and justifying the immoral.

Godless Mama is a liberal, atheist, anti-theist writer and parent seeking to make the world a better place through the spread of secularism and the exposing of the harms of religion. In addition to GodlessMama.com, she contributes to a number of other political and atheist pages and blogs.

22 Reasons to STOP Believing in God

Animated map shows how religion spread around the world

Be sure to ‘like’ us on Facebook


  1. Oh, my, this is such a terrible post. Almost everything in Christianity is full of symbolism, it’s stupid if you take it literally. Jesus’ sacrifice wasn’t to wash your sins away literally. His sacrifice represents the beginning of a new age(where people would stop eye-to-eye themselves and sacrifice their lusts to respect their fellow brothers)
    We all have a cross on our back and our sufferings carved on it. Spiritually, we also have to follow in Jesus’ footsteps.
    And you also confuse religion with faith. Those two are exclusive. The religious God was written from their perspective. In that context, whenever they did something(such as punishing the wicked), they thought it was the God’s will, and so they described the natural events that occured in the world. Also, the 10 Plagues are symbolic. They represent the hard times the Egyptians endured when they refused accept Monotheism and kept following the Polytheism.

    Leave alone religion, and you understand there is a supernatural force that keeps the universe in order and also created it. Each organized action demands an intelligent designer.

    • It always puzzles me when I hear someone say the Bible is completely symbolic, because they always draw conclusions from the symbolism that are generally not obvious to anyone but them. It makes me wonder if they read Beatrix Potter's "The Tale of Peter Rabbit" they would extract all kinds of symbolism from it too. And it reminds me of when I showed one of my pieces of art to a friend he pointed out rows of symbolic penises in it, which are not really there — they're actually drawn from a strange rock formation of an ancient shoreline tilted by tectonic forces with the weathered sandstone ripples appearing like teeth. My friend saw penises. I think it said a lot about him.

      Nothing in the universe demands an intelligent designer. In fact many things about the world prove there can't possibly be an intelligent designer. Take for example our need to consume vitamin C. Almost every other animal on Earth manufactures their own vitamin C. We and the other closely related apes have inherited a mutated version of one of the enzymes involved in making vitamin C. We still have all the other chemical machinery for making it, just the process at that point is broken.

      Look at our appendix, which often gets infected and kills us. That's a leftover from our evolutionary past.

      Our backs are very badly "designed" for walking upright, which is why it gives people such trouble.

      Our taste for sugar would have been very good for our survival as apes, but as humans it has caused us endless problems.

      Our wisdom teeth suit the larger jaws of our ancestors, but the genetic mutation that distorted our skull, giving us this giant brain also made our jaw too small for our final set of molars… which can actually kill us.

      On the topic of our giant brain, this is what kills a lot of mothers and babies at birth. No other animal has the problem of trying to push such an enormous skull out of the womb that humans do. That's certainly not what I'd call a very intelligent design.

      The human foot, when you look at it carefully, was obviously being shaped by evolution towards something else, but it never got there because the main selection forces on us were suspended by our extraordinary intelligence… so we're left with these feet that are not quite one thing nor another, and not particularly great for any.

      Our eyes, far from being evidence of design, are actually proof of the lack of a designer. Because of the way the mammalian eye evolved we have layers of nerves and blood vessels in front of our light sensors. Octopuses don't have this flaw because their eyes evolved a different way.

      Also, because our ancestors at the time of the dinosaurs were small, nocturnal rat-like creatures, we mammals stand alone in almost all the animal kingdom, as having colorless vision ("rod" cells are more sensitive to dim light than "cone" cells which see color). Some mammals regained some color vision, though generally very limited. We primates regained 3 primary colors (though we have color blindness running through our populations). Almost all other animals — fish, reptiles, birds, many insects — see 4 primary colors. If you think that's an insignificant difference, note that this gives more than 20 distinct secondary colors to them, but we have a bare handful (such as yellow, orange, purple, pink). So much for humans being the creator's specially designed creatures.

      I could keep this up for hours. There are hundreds of examples of the utter lack of intelligent design. The world is amazing, but it clearly was not designed by anybody, in fact that makes it even more wonderful, in my view.

      • If we evolved what part of your body can you live without? Skin, nervous system, vascular, bones, stomach feeding the whole body? How did the eye evolve? An animal thought I need to see, so a billion years later it could . Or , eye sockets formed in the skull with no purpose, how could a visual nervous system have evolved before their was an eye to giv it information? There is no way in science and evolution thatit could have evolved by chance. The only answer is it had to be created all at the same time. All. Our hearts, brains, mussels, bones, skin , stomach , which one of these can we live without ? None. Proof of God. Find out who he is in the new testament.

        • Looking at scientific conclusions and saying “that can’t be true because it’s extraordinary!” or “that’s not right because I can’t conceive of that happening!” is fallacious thinking that narrows your understanding of the world. I fully believe I live a more enriching life because I dedicate time that would otherwise be wasted praying or in church to learning about the world. If you’re right, and there is a God, would he not want us spending all of our time actively appreciating the world he made for us? Would he not want us to use this gift of reason he divinely gifted us to cast out nonsensical beliefs?

          Maybe look into Gnostic belief systems like Hermeticism to see where I’m coming from here. I personally have some spiritual beliefs but I fully reject Christianity and all of its fundamental teachings because they claim to justify themselves, while belief in God is placed at a higher priority than living a virtuous life. If divinity exists, we are divine because we are capable of thought, and therefore capable of reason. If there is a God then his greatest gift to us is reason. Even if we were created simply to worship and be pious, we would only be able to do so because we have free will and we have the means to reason out that God is supreme and worthy of worship. Therefore, using logic and reason is the most supremely divine thing humans can do, and it is the way to be closest to God. It is then our responsibility to cast out those beliefs that make no sense. So even if you’re right and there is a God, he is not your God and he is not the author of any books.

  2. Miriam English And don’t forget that many (most?) humans have the teeth from hell. Brush, floss, swish, brush floss swish, get them scraped off every six months and still they try to rot and break and get gum disease so they want to fall out. The enamel wears off, the gums recede and I could go on and on.Many of us due to genetics, unhealthy mothers during our gestation and a gazillion other things, not all in our control, conspire to take our teeth from us. Few if any other species have the teeth problems from hell. And they do little or no dental care. Rabbits teeth just keep regenerating! Lucky them! Seems to me that intelligent design could have done better then this!

  3. Oh my gosh what a FACE-PALMING article. This person clearly doesn't even know the beginner baby-food starter steps of Christian belief, he is a self-professed know it all who doesn't know the first thing. To say Christians do not follow the Old testament God is ridiculous, and destroys all your credibility instantly. What a face palm. You have no clue about anything. The OT God is the NT God. If you dont know that, you need help and serious education before you start flapping your gums about this topic. Atheists will always be uneducated narcissistic conjecture-addicts.

    • No one is saying that you don’t believe they’re the same. The thing is, non-Christians familiar with the Bible (who are often more familiar with it than most Christians) see a character change between the two halves of the book. If we look at God as a character in His own story, there is an unexplained change between the Old and New Testaments. He goes from vindictive and spiteful to kind, loving, and forgiving. What happened? Different authorship, of course. Because God behaves so differently between the two, when discussing the Bible in general people tend to differentiate OT God and NT God as different characters. Kind of like in shows with a time skip where characters go through training off-screen, when we talk about power levels for said character we specify pre-timeskip and post-timeskip as different since they’ve grown in power (and hopefully character) across that time.

      Literally, Christian Bible scholars make this distinction. We’re talking people who devote their lives to studying the Bible because they are so dedicated to God, they all agree that the Bible was authored by human hands, and that the clear divides between styles and interpretations indicate different understandings of stories that accumulate to the two halves reading as completely different texts.

  4. Great article, thank you. As a recovering Christian I've had to come to terms with each of those fallacies to my Christian paradigm. It isn't easy getting over being raised in a world that does not exist. Thanks again.
    I'd like to invite your readers and you to check out a novel I have written. I think you all will find it an enjoyable read. http://www.frompaultosaul.com


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here