When Did the Catholic Church Decide Priests Should Be Celibate?

By Helen L. Owen | October 2001
History News Network

The belief that religious figures should be celibate began long before the birth of Christianity. Ancient Druid priests were thought to have been celibate and Aztec temple priests were expected to remain sexually abstinent. Other pre-Christian sects mandated that the people chosen for their sacrificial offerings must be pure, meaning that they had never engaged in sex.

Jesus lived a chaste life and never married and at one point in the Bible is referred to as a eunuch (Matthew 19:12), though most scholars believe that this was intended metaphorically. The implication was that Jesus lived a celibate life like a eunuch. Many of his disciples were also chaste and celibate. Paul, in his first letter to the Corinthians, recommends celibacy for women: “To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is well for them to remain single as I do. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion.” (1 Cor. 7:8-9) But the early Christian church had no hard and fast rule against clergy marrying and having children. Peter, a Galilee fisherman, whom the Catholic Church considers the first Pope, was married. Some Popes were the sons of Popes.

The first written mandate requiring priests to be chaste came in AD 304. Canon 33 of the Council of Elvira stated that all “bishops, presbyters, and deacons and all other clerics” were to “abstain completely from their wives and not to have children.” A short time later, in 325, the Council of Nicea, convened by Constantine, rejected a ban on priests marrying requested by Spanish clerics.

The practice of priestly celibacy began to spread in the Western Church in the early Middle Ages. In the early 11th century Pope Benedict VIII responded to the decline in priestly morality by issuing a rule prohibiting the children of priests from inheriting property. A few decades later Pope Gregory VII issued a decree against clerical marriages.

The Church was a thousand years old before it definitively took a stand in favor of celibacy in the twelfth century at the Second Lateran Council held in 1139, when a rule was approved forbidding priests to marry. In 1563, the Council of Trent reaffirmed the tradition of celibacy.

Several explanations have been offered for the decision of the Church to adopt celibacy. Barry University’s Ed Sunshine told Knight-Ridder that the policy was initiated to distinguish the clergy as a special group: “A celibate clergy became the paradigm of separation from the sinful world.” A.W. Richard Sipe, a former priest and author of Sex, Priests and Power: The Anatomy of Crisis (1995), told Knight-Ridder that the “question at the time was who is the final power – the king or the church. If [the church] could control a person’s sex life, it could control their money, their employment, their benefice.” Garry Wills suggested in Under God that the ban on marriage was adopted to lift the status of priests at a time when their authority was being challenged by nobles and others.

Protestants early on took exception to celibacy, arguing that it promoted masturbation, homosexuality and illicit fornication. Martin Luther singled out masturbation as one of the gravest offenses likely to be committed by those who were celibate. “Nature never lets up,” Luther warned, “we are all driven to the secret sin. To say it crudely but honestly, if it doesn’t go into a woman, it goes into your shirt.” American Protestants in the 17th century, fearful of radical religious sects like the Shakers that celebrated celibacy, came out foursquare against the practice.

The Roman Catholic Church’s position today is derived from the Council of Trent. Celibacy is considered an important part of the priesthood, a sign of a priest’s commitment to God and service. Today, though, there are some exceptions to the rule of unmarried clergy. Anglican ministers who were already married when they joined the Catholic Church are allowed to remain married if they choose to join the priesthood.

The Catholic Church distinguishes between dogma and regulations. The male-only priesthood is Catholic dogma, irreversible by papal decree. The ban on marriage is considered a regulation. As Knight-Ridder put it, “That means the pope could change it overnight if he wished.”

The first modern scholar to make a comprehensive study of church celibacy was Henry Charles Lea over a century ago. Lea, a Protestant critical of the Catholic Church, closed his long book with the following statement:

We may be on the eve of great changes, but it is not easy to anticipate a change so radical as that which would permit the abolition of celibacy. The traditions of the past must first be forgotten; the hopes of the future must first be abandoned. The Latin church is the most wonderful structure in history, and ere its leaders can consent to such a reform they must confess that its career, so full of proud recollections, has been an error.

Sources

Henry Charles Lea, An Historical Sketch of Sacerdotal Celibacy in the Christian Church (J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1867). (To access an online edition of the book, published by MOA (Making of America) click here (allow several minutes to download the text).

Erik R Seeman; “‘It is better to marry than to burn’: Anglo-American attitudes toward celibacy, 1600-1800,” Journal of Family History (October, 1999).

Michele Prince, Mandatory Celibacy in the Catholic Church – A Handbook for the Laity (Pasadena, CA: New Paradigm Books, 1992).

Stefan Heid, Celibacy in the Early Church (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1997).

Peter Brown, The Body and Society – Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1988).

Celibacy in the Catholic Church: The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India website, http://www.cbcisite.com/.

Knight-Ridder/Tribune News Service, April 26, 2002 (as published by South Florida Sun-Sentinel).

Trailer: The Bride Behind the Altar

Be sure to ‘like’ us on Facebook

8 COMMENTS

  1. The primary reason for the ban on marriage was to prevent Church property from being inherited by the priest's children.

    • You are right Juan. The celebacy was enforced in the face of an administrative issue. But ithe still has roots in the Gospels and letters. I do agree with the adoption of choice of being celebate or either married but again their will be the same issue of church property being lost. In pakistan I know many cases of Anglican bishops whose sons have sold a lot of precious lands of the church. So where to go. The matter is quite delicate.

  2. Yes!!!! indeed!!! this man-made rule…of,,,mandatory celibacy was put in by some pope just for ''politics''…so shameful!!! yes!!!! so to prevent church property from being inherited by the priest's children. when God from the begining blest the union of man and woman to go forth and multiply,,,yes…even roman catholic priests…they are human…not…''robots'' as the church expects them to be!!! for centuries the church has hidden dirty sexual secrets and dirty perverted priests sexually molesting innocent youths. so shameful!!! if the anglan married priests are doing a great job handling the Lord's work and family life…so can…the roman catholic pirests!!!! it's high time….our church goes back to its' original roots taught from our frist christian priests…our disciples…whom were married…including…saint peter!!!!! they should just make…celibacy…optional….like it use to be!!! thank you and many blessings!!!! p.s. enough talk and debating in the vatican,,,we need to see…ACTION!!!! because if they don't make…celibacy…optional….in 20 years…we will not have anymore priests. The ones we have are elederly!!! On behalf of my friend…Daniel…a married priest….and so many….please help support…''optional celibacy''….amen!!!!

    • I completely agree with you Maria ! Maybe you would like to visit my website, http://forbidden-to-love.com/ where I give many resources on other stories of women and priests who wrote books or built websites or support groups. I am myself been rejected by the church. The man I love is a priest and they were ruthlessly vindictive toward me. I wrote a book that will be coming out in a few months. I hope that my work will contribute to a change on that tradition where they would give the freedom of choice. If you like my website please share so that we can make a difference !

      Louise

      • I was a Catholic, since I was born to the age of 40. By the grace of God. I managed to be a born-again christian at the age of 45. By God’s love, I am now a pastor, with NEEMA Ministry.
        During my stay in Catholic church, I learned so many things which are not biblical, one of them is forced celibacy for the priests. They couldn’t live a pure life, they secretly have girlfriends, etc. and pretend to maintain celibacy.
        It is time for a change, no need to practice something which is man made, not biblical.

  3. Comment: The Church has established an order .everyone has also the freedom to decide to commit himself to it or not. In the Catholic Church, choosing to go for priesthood means choosing to be celibate. One is neither forced or deceived to become a priest. So, the Church is right in her wisdom to institute celibacy forward desired priests anyway, and would reverse the rule only at dire need to do so.

    Vincent-jasper Kelechi

  4. Apparently, according to many historians of religions.
    Due to the many translations of the bible it would appear that a mistake was made when translating from Samarian. The translator wrote CELIBATE instead of CELEBRATE.

  5. I think now is the time for the Pope to study the matter of priests being able to marry.I only now when the horrenous expose of over 300 priests in the state of Pennsylvania sexually abusing according to the latest news over 1000. children many way under the age of 18.Everyone no matter what religion should be overwhelmingly concerned over this.According to the news there was a mass cover up by the Catholic Church.I think instances like this would not occur if priests were allowed to marry it is totally unatural for men to be celibate.We are living in the 21st century not the 12th century the ignorance that pervaded then no longer exists.Men can be perfectly good priests, faithful and honorable with a wife and children.,why not Protestant men who are married have been teaching and preaching since Martin Luthers reformation.Maybe because of all the sexual abuse of minors it is time for the current Pope to consider allowing a choice to men who would like to be priests to decide for themselves wether or not they would wish to remain celibate or not.Priestly celibacy in the Catholic church is tradition not dogma.The Pope could change it overnight maybe that time has come!

Leave a Reply to Juan Dizon Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here