The non-religious are now America’s largest religious voting bloc

    By Christopher Ingraham | 14 July 2016
    The Washington Post

    American voters are losing their religion.
    American voters are losing their religion. (Credit: Astrid Westvang / Flickr / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

    More American voters than ever say they are not religious, making the religiously unaffiliated the nation’s biggest voting bloc by faith for the first time in a presidential election year. This marks a dramatic shift from just eight years ago, when the non-religious were roundly outnumbered by Catholics, white mainline Protestants and white evangelical Protestants.

    These numbers come from a new Pew Research Center survey, which finds that “religious ‘nones,’ who have been growing rapidly as a share of the U.S. population, now constitute one-fifth of all registered voters and more than a quarter of Democratic and Democratic-leaning registered voters.” That represents a 50 percent increase in the proportion of non-religious voters compared with eight years ago, when they made up just 14 percent of the overall electorate.

    “In 2008, religious ‘nones’ were outnumbered or at parity with white mainline Protestants and white Catholics,” the survey’s lead researcher, Greg Smith, said in an interview. “Today, ‘nones’ outnumber both of those groups.”

    The growth of the non-religious — about 54 percent of whom are Democrats or lean Democratic, compared with 23 percent at least leaning Republican — could provide a political counterweight to white evangelical Protestants, a historically powerful voting bloc for Republicans. In 2016, 35 percent of Republican voters identify as white evangelicals, while 28 percent of Democratic voters say they have no religion at all.

    But while the religiously unaffiliated are making up a larger share of American voters, that doesn’t necessarily mean that that will translate into actual votes. Exit polls of people who actually cast votes — as opposed to preelection polls of registered voters — have traditionally shown that the unaffiliated underperform at the ballot box relative to their raw numbers.

    For instance, in the 2012 election, the unaffiliated made up 18 percent of registered voters in preelection polls but only 12 percent of the people who actually voted, as measured in post-election exit polls. Some of this difference may be due to the different ways the two polls ask religious-affiliation questions, but Pew’s researchers say that the underperformance of the non-religious is a very real phenomenon.

    “While the group is growing rapidly in the general public, its growth has been much less dramatic in the electorate,” Pew’s Smith said. “It could be the ‘nones’ are not connected, almost by definition, to religious institutions, which can play an important role in spurring turnout and interest in politics.”

    Smith also points out that the unaffiliated tend to be younger than the religious and that young people tend to vote less than older people.

    Still, the Pew study finds other evidence that religion may be becoming a less potent force at the ballot box. In 2008, for instance, 72 percent of voters said it was important for a president to have strong religious beliefs. That number is down to 62 percent today.

    Similarly, Americans see religious institutions as playing a smaller role in the public sphere. In 2008, 75 percent said that churches and other houses of worship contributed a great deal to solving social problems. Today, that number has fallen to 58 percent.

    Animated map shows how religion spread around the world

    The Future of World Religion (in 2050)

    Be sure to ‘like’ us on Facebook


    1. The world needs a republican form of a government patterned after the noble ideas espoused in the American Declaration of Independence.

    2. American here. I was born into the Episcopal religion, brought up as a Christian Scientist, and then stopped thinking about church and religion. It had been too hard to study the Bible for Sunday school every week. I felt like a failure. So, I went on without thinking about God or religion or the Bible. A tragedy occurred and I needed to go to services again, and I became a Presbyterian. I am not well-versed in the Bible, but I was a pre-school church teacher (they're three year olds; I taught them patience, kindness, how to play together and what it mean to be thankful). I no longer attend service, and at first I felt great guilt about it. Still, I am Christian and love God. I believe in Jesus. My sister, a practicing Christian Scientist, is my prayer buddy. Prayer and faith always bring me back. I know these two practices are universal, but I thank Christianity for bringing them front and center to my life. God is Love. God is everywhere. We are here to serve Him. Have a great day!

    3. I am a Catholic in recovery. I am no Christian. If I believe in anything, it would be the Goddess, or Buddha, or Nature & Science. I vote Blue. For a country that is supposed to have religious freedom and separation of church and state, this country needs more atheists/agnostics to turn out at election time. Maybe this country would not be in the dire straights it is if more moral, not religious people were in office!

    4. When well-meaning — and not well-meaning — people create religious institutions that too many times distort the truth using dogma, people recognize that in their gut and can’t find the spiritual inspiration they seek (in religious institutions). My guess is that most of those non-religious people are spiritual and good (but not perfect) people. My question is why don’t enough of them vote?


    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here